Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.
To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to upgrade your browser.
This article briefly discusses about the Utopian Socialism and Scientific Socialism. It also also analyses them comparatively and tries to explore how they are compliment to each other. This paper helps the student to know about Utopian and Scientific socialism in brief but clearly within a few time.
It is difficult to define Socialism as what it is and what it is not is a contentious debate. However, some common features of Socialism can be summarised as follows. It is concerned with the relationship between the individual, state, and society. Socialists believe that a well-ordered society cannot exist without a state apparatus, not least because the state is seen as the most effective vehicle for coordinating and administering to the needs of all.
We must acknowledge that 'few' specific, if not a wide array elements of socialist thought long predate the socialist ideology that emerged in the first half of the 19th Century. Considering that It's no shocker that Plato's "The Republic" and Sir Thomas More's "Utopia", dating from 1516, have been cited as including Socialist or Communist ideas. Modern Socialism has it's genesis in the early 19th Century Britain and France, from a wide ranging array of doctrines and social trials, largely as a conseqence or protest against some of the excesses of 18th and 19th Century Capitalism. Early 19th Century Socialist thought was largely utopian in nature, followed by the more pragmatic and revolutionary Socialist and Communist movements in the later 19th Century.Social critics in the late 18th Century and early 19th Century such as Robert Owen (1771 - 1858), Charles Fourier (1772 - 1837), Pierre-Joseph Proudhon (1809 - 1865), Louis Blanc (1811 - 1882) and Henri de Saint-Simon (1760 - 1825) criticized the excesses of poverty and inequality of the Industrial Revolution, and advocated reforms such as the egalitarian distribution of wealth and the transformation of society into small utopian communities in which private property was to be abolished. It was Karl Marx, though, who first employed systematic analysis (sometimes known as "scientific socialism") in an ambitious attempt to expose Capitalism's contradictions and the specific mechanisms by which it exploits and alienates. His ambitious work "Das Kapital", the first volume of which was published in 1867 with two more edited and published after his death by Friedrich Engels (1820 - 1895), is modelled to some extent on Adam Smith's "Wealth of Nations", one of the cornerstones of Capitalist theory. In it, he transforms Smith's labour theory of value into his own characteristic "law of value" (that the exchange value of a commodity is actually independent of the amount of labour required to appropriate its useful qualities), and reveals how commodity fetishism obscures the reality of Capitalist society. In 1864, the International Workingmen's Association (IWA) or First International, was founded in London, and became the first major international forum for the promulgation of Socialist ideas, under the leadership of Marx and Johann Georg Eccarius. Anarchists, like the Russian Mikhail Bakunin (1814 - 1876), and proponents of other alternative visions of Socialism which emphasized the potential of small-scale communities and agrarianism, coexisted with the more influential currents of Marxism and social democracy. Much of the developement of Socialism is indistinguishable for the development of Communism, which is essentially an extreme variant of Socialism. Marx and Engels, who together had founded the Social Democratic Workers' Party of Germany in 1869, were also responsible for setting up the Second International (or Socialist International) in 1889, as the ideas of Socialism gained new adherents, especially in Central Europe, and just before his death in 1895, Engels boasted of a "single great international army of socialists". When the First World War started in 1914, the socialist social democratic parties in the UK, France, Belgium and Germany supported their respective states' war effort, discarding their commitment to internationalism and solidarity, and the Second International dissolved during the war. Needless to say, Marks and Engels weren't the only parents to this ideology and practice. To try and wrap the entire event of the rise of Socialism in the mentioned era with a few pivotal points, contributions and events would be a hap-hazard attempt at understanding Socialism as an end to the old order of the European society. Hence, with this assingment we will intend to delve deeper into the factors that shaped socialism in the 19th century Europe. We will also attempt to achieve a better undertsanding of it's details and it's consequences.
The Romanian Journal of Modern History
Mazzini and Marx: two political statements2015 •
The birth of the First (Socialist) International in 1864 provides the opportunity for two political thinkers of the 19th century, Karl Marx and Giuseppe Mazzini, to both cooperate and quarrel. Published in „The Romanian Journal of Modern History” (http://rjmh.ro/about-us), vol. VI, no. 1-2, 2015, ISSN: 2068-715X, pp. 5-18.
2020 •
Marx set himself a completely different task from that of previous socialists; his absolute priority was to ‘reveal the economic law of motion of modern society. His aim was to develop a comprehensive critique ofbthe capitalist mode of production, which would serve the proletariat, the principal revolutionary subject, in the overthrow of the existing socialeconomic system. Moreover, having no wish to inculcate a new religion, Marx refrained from promoting an idea which he considered theoretically pointless and politically counterproductive: a universal model of communist society.For this reason, in the ‘Postface to the Second Edition’ (1873) of Capital, volume I (1867), he made it clear that he had no interest in ‘writing recipes for the cook-shops of the future’.
This paper seeks to summarise the interplay between utopian and dystopian thinking throughout the twentieth century with a particular focus on the city. The gradually shrinking appeal of the socialist utopia and its replacement with the globalised free–market as a ‘revanchist utopia’ left socialist utopian thinking in a state of disarray towards the end of the previous century. Utopian thinking, both as a literary and political genre has been rendered marginal in contemporary political practices. Urban dystopia, or ‘Stadtschmerz’, is now prevalent in critical Western thinking about city and society. It is concluded that the declining political impact of critical urban research is caused partly by its lack of engagement with crafting imaginative alternative futures for the city. The works by Sennett, Sandercock and the Situationists, among others, may contain elements to reverse the current utopian malaise in urban research.
F. Polak and K. Mannheim's reconceptualization of the role of the utopist as a radical/revolutionary who acts to shatter present reality and reconstruct it according to a vision of the future is evaluated in the light of K. Popper's critique of utopian engineering; also, Popper's proposal of piecemeal engineering is critiqued and found deficient. Polak's thesis of a vital image of the future is tested on the basis of J. B. Bury's idea of progress and found to be modern-born. The historic roots of the dominant utopian image of the future (within the idea of progress) are clarified as the technological/consumer society within industrial civilization. However, as this modern thesis become dystopic, an antithesis, in the form of utopian socialism, emerged to contend with the dominant utopian image of the future throughout the 19th and 20th centuries. The dialectical struggle between contending utopic images of the future within the idea of progress brought about the progressive-socialist synthesis, which in turn, opposed by reactionary neoliberalism (a "counter-utopia"), has realized a new, postmodern thesis - as global sustainable development - a reconstructed, 21st century utopian image of the future.
This is the syllabus (with a set of essays to introduce the weekly readings) for a course I taught at Harvard in the Fall Semester of 1998.
2021 •
Werner Bonefeld, Beverly Best and Chris O'Kane (eds.), SAGE Handbook of Frankfurt School Critical Theory (SAGE)
Ernst Bloch: The Principle of Hope2018 •
2016 •
The Russian Revolution Centenary Lecture
Utopia and Dystopia in Revolutionary Russia.pdf2017 •
Social Democracy, a contemporary outlook
Social Democracy, from Berstein to the Post-Modern Challenge2022 •
Expanded version of remarks delivered on the "Sex and the Left" panel discussion at the Howard Zinn Book Fair in SF.
Sexual Freedom in Capital2019 •
Rubikon : Journal of Transnational American Studies
Capitalism and Socialism as Ideological Constructions in American Dystopian NovelsPraktyka Teoretyczna
Principles of the Common: Towards a Political Philosophy of Polish Cooperativism2018 •